7%), while the dinucleotide repeats represented < 3% (Table 2). Tetranucleotide repeats constituted the second most frequent
motif (16.7%) followed by hexanucleotide (13.11%) and pentanucleotide (4.91) repeat motifs in sequences of all three formae speciales. However, the percentage of di and pentanucleotide repeat was higher in Fom. This agrees with the results from other eukaryotes, where trinucleotide repeats are overrepresented in coding region (Garnica et al., 2006). Out of 30, a total of 14 SSR markers (six from Fom, three from Foc, and five from Fol) amplified easily scorable bands ranged from 70 to 400 bp in all the isolates. Of the 14 markers, three amplified dinucleotide repeats, ten amplified trinucleotide repeats, and only one marker were able to amplify tetranucleotide
click here repeat. We used three indexes (percentage of polymorphic SSRs, number of alleles per locus and PIC value) to indicate SSR polymorphism level. Among all the markers, nine see more markers (64.3%) were polymorphic, whereas rest five markers (35.7%) were monomorphic. A total of 28 alleles were amplified by 14 markers. We detected 1–4 alleles per microsatellite locus with an average of two alleles per marker. FomSSR primers amplified 10 alleles with 1.8 allele per locus, whereas FocSSR primers detected 4.0 alleles with 1.3 alleles per locus and FolSSR primers detected 14 alleles with 2.8 alleles per locus. Maximum numbers of alleles (4) were amplified by FolSSR-7, while minimum one allele was amplified with five markers viz. FomSSR-3, FomSSR-5, FomSSR-9, FocSSR-5, and FocSSR-6. Three
markers namely FomSSR-8, FolSSR-3, and FolSSR-6 amplified three alleles, while five markers namely FomSSR-2, FomSSR-6, FocSSR-3, FolSSR-2, and FolSSR-10 amplified two alleles (Table 3). Of nine polymorphic markers, eight showed 100% polymorphism and one showed 66% (FolSSR-6). On comparison of polymorphism potential of markers derived from each forma specialis, of six SSR markers from Fom and three SSR markers from Foc, only three (50%) and one (65%) markers were found polymorphic, respectively (Table 4). FolSSR markers exhibited highest percentage of polymorphism (100%), all the five markers were found polymorphic. Among the polymorphic markers, the maximum PIC value was obtained with FocSSR-5 (0.899) and minimum with FolSSR-6 (0.023), the average being 0.517. The similarity coefficient Rutecarpine values between isolates ranged from 0.14 to 0.96 with a mean of 0.61 for all 276 isolate combinations used in the present study. For microsatellite markers derived from Fom, the similarity coefficient values between isolates ranged from 0.22 to 1.00 with average genetic diversity of 33.1%. Similarly, with Foc-derived SSR markers, the similarity coefficients between isolates ranged from 0.4 to 1.00 with 34.5% genetic diversity. For Fol markers, similarity coefficient value ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 with an average diversity being 42.7% (Table 4). The highest similarity coefficient (0.