84%, p = 0054) There was a trend toward higher approval rates f

84%, p = 0.054). There was a trend toward higher approval rates from government compared to private insurance (see Table). Government and private insurers were equally likely to approve FDA-approved regimens and Sof/Sim. There was no difference in approval rates in cirrhotics or LT recipients. Overall, prior response had no impact on approval but among prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Library research buy P/NR patients, government insurers were more likely to approve the AASLD/IDSA recommended Sof/Sim compared to private insurers. Approval of FDA-approved regimens for treatment naïve and relapsers was similar regardless of insurance. CONCLUSIONS: 1) A high rate of approval for 2nd generation

DAA treatment was seen. 2) Naïve and prior relapse status, presence of cirrhosis, and transplant status did not affect approval rate. 3) Government insurance plans were more likely to approve HCV treatment and were significantly more adherent to the AASLD/IDSA guidelines for P/NR than private insurers. Approval Rates (%) Disclosures: Trametinib price The following people have nothing to disclose: Fredric D. Gordon, Amir A. Qamar, Patricia M. Hogan, Lois V. Daponte, Mary Ann Simpson BACKGROUND AND AIM: SOF-containing regimens have been approved for treatment of HCV-HIV patients. We assessed the impact of SOF in HCV-HIV patients treated with SOF and ribavirin (SOF+RBV) during Phase 3 PHOTON-1 trial. METHODS: HIV-HCV co-infected

patients were treated with 12 or 24 weeks of SOF+RBV. Matched controls from HCV mono-infected participants in FUSION and VALENCE trials. All subjects completed 4 PRO questionnaires [Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-HCV (CLDQ-HCV), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and Work Productivity and Activity Index: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP)]

before, during, and post-treatment. RESULTS: PHOTON-1 cohort included 223 patients (51% genotype 1, 95% receiving antiretroviral therapy). Baseline PROs were generally similar between HIV-HCV co-infected vs. HCV mono-infected patients. During treatment, moderate decrements in some PROs (up to 7.0% on a 0-100% scale for activity impairment of 上海皓元 WPAI:SHP, p=0.0027) were experienced regardless of treatment duration (p>0.05). In HIV-HCV co-infected patients with SVR-12 (N=176), most of PROs improved (by up to 12.1% for the “worry” domain of CLDQ-HCV, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, female gender, treatment-experienced, older age and having a history of anxiety, depression and clinically overt fatigue were the most consistent independent predictors of lower PROs (all p<0.05). Furthermore, treatment-related PRO decrements, as well as post-SVR PRO scores were similar between HIV-HCV co-infected and HCV-mono-infected patients (all p>0.05). In the multivariate analysis, co-infection with HIV was not associated with PRO impairment at any time point (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HIV-HCV treated with IFN-free SOF-based regimens have similar PROs to those with HCV mono-infection.

Comments are closed.