According to the U.S. legislation, the claim “good source” might be used for protein if this nutrient contributes with 10–19% of the DRV per RACC (US CFR, 2010c). The claim “high” for the protein content is allowed for products presenting 20% or higher of DRV for this nutrient per

100 g or serving portion in Brazil and in the U.S., respectively (Brasil, 1998 and US CFR, 2010c). For the purpose of labelling in Brazil and the U.S., a value of 50 g of protein shall be the DRVs for adults (ANVISA, 2005 and US selleck products CFR, 2010a) and, only in the U.S, also for 4 years-old children or older (US CFR, 2010a). In the E.U., the claim “source” for protein may only be used if the food protein content of a product provides at least 12% of its total energy and a “high” product must provide at least 20% of its total energy from its protein content (EC, 2007). According to current Brazilian legislation (ANVISA, 2005 and Brasil, 1998), mousses containing whey protein concentrate (WPC, MF–WPC, I–WPC, and MF–I–WPC) might receive the claim “source” Metabolism inhibitor in terms

of the total value of protein in 100 g of food product (Table 3 and Table 7). When the U.S. legislation (US CFR, 2010a and US CFR, 2010c) is taken into consideration, 10–19% of DRV for protein (5–9.5 g) and a serving portion of 120 g, all mousses might receive the “good source” claim for proteins – from a minimum of 5.28 g up to a maximum of 9.57 g of protein for mousses MF–I and WPC per RACC, respectively (data not shown). Nonetheless, none of the products could be claimed as “high” for the protein content according to the Brazilian and the U.S. standards. Interleukin-3 receptor All formulations might receive the “source” claim for protein and mousses WPC and I–WPC might also be termed “high” for this nutrient considering the energy percentage provided by protein required by the E.U. standards (Table 7).

In this case, the energy (kcal) provided by proteins ranged from 12.75% and 13.26% for mousses MF and MF–I, respectively, up to 20.27% and 24.43% for mousses I–WPC and WPC, respectively (data not shown). Increased” is a comparative claim that might be used in Brazil for proteins when there is both a 25% increase and a difference above 10% of DRV (correspondent to at least 5.0 g protein/100 g) between the modified solid or semi-solid product and the reference one (ANVISA, 2005 and Brasil, 1998). A product might be considered “increased” in protein content in the E.U. if it meets the conditions for the claim “source” and the increase in protein is at least 30% compared to the reference product (EC, 2007). The claim “enriched” might be used for protein in the U.S. if this nutrient contributes with 10% or more of the DRV per RACC than the reference product (US CFR, 2010a and US CFR, 2010c). Following the Brazilian and U.S.