GC-MS identified three monoterpenoids: 1,8-cineole, camphor and -pinene, and a sesquiterpenoid: -caryophyllene, as the main constituents. The leaf extract is cytotoxic to several human tumour
cell lines in a dose-dependent fashion, with IC50 values ranging between 10-40 g mL-1. Apoptosis was shown to be induced in SK-MEL-28 human melanoma cells at a concentration of 20 g mL-1, as identified by means of morphological examination, nuclear staining and flow cytometric analysis of DNA content. Translocation of phosphatidyl serine to the cell membrane’s external surface and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential were also detected. This study provides further insight into the potential use of mixtures of terpenoids as they occur in nature, as inducers of apoptosis
in cancer cells.”
“Five compounds were isolated from the root powder of Periploca sepium. By mainly HR-ESI-MS, H-1, C-13, and 2D NMR SB203580 supplier spectral data, they were characterized as periplocoside X (1), oligasaccharide A (2), periplocoside A (3), periplocoside E (4), and periplocoside N (5), respectively. Compounds 1-5 were found to possess insecticidal activities against the red imported fire ant. Among the compounds, periplocoside X showed significant activity with LD50 values of 748.99, 116.62, 2169.58, and 3079.33mg/l against soldiers, workers, males, and alate females of red imported fire ant, respectively.”
“Purpose of reviewHydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) is the tenth most commonly LCL161 prescribed drug in recent data. Although no head-to-head trials compare HCTZ with the uncommonly prescribed chlorthalidone (CTDN) in reducing cardiovascular events (CVEs), numerous other data are available.Recent findingsHead-to-head trials have shown CTDN’s superiority
in antihypertensive potency, particularly during the critical nighttime period (SBP difference 7.1mmHg), due to the differences in duration of action (16-24h for HCTZ versus 48-72h for CTDN). In an observational cohort study, compared with HCTZ, CTDN was associated with lower left A-1210477 datasheet ventricular hypertrophy. In another observational cohort analysis (n=12866), the percentage risk reduction in CVEs from CTDN versus HCTZ was 21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8-32], P=0.002. In network meta-analyses of randomized trials (n=50946), CTDN was superior to HCTZ in reducing congestive heart failure and in reducing all CVEs: percentage risk reduction 21 (95% CI 12-28), P<0.0001. A statistically significant reduction in CVEs by CTDN versus HCTZ persisted even when reduction in office SBP produced by the two diuretics was identical, further strengthening the case for CTDN.SummaryDirect and indirect evidence demonstrates that CTDN is superior to HCTZ in reducing CVEs and is congruent with the recent changes in the guidelines for hypertension management.