In a number of EU countries, including Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the promotion of offshore wind energy has been a strong driving force behind the development of national MSP frameworks [25], [27] and [28]. The growing interest in offshore renewable energy represents a response to anticipated economic benefits in terms of job creation and stimulating growth, as well as concerns over energy security [29] and [30]. It is also a response to obligations under the EU Renewable Energy Directive (Directive 2009/28/EC), which is a key component of the EU Climate and Energy Pack adopted in 2008 to contribute to EU’s fulfilment of Kyoto Protocol objectives. The Pack

includes a legally binding obligation to increase the share of renewables to 20% of total energy consumption in the EU by 2020. The Renewable Energy Buparlisib mw Directive was adopted to address this obligation. Under this directive, Member States are required to meet its national overall target for the share of energy from renewable sources in 2020, which is set out in Annex I of the Directive. Each Member State is also required to adopt a national renewable energy action plan, providing projections for the share of renewable energy consumed in electricity, transport and heating/cooling sectors in 2020 (Table S1, Supplementary Material). According to the submitted

national renewable energy action plans, Selleck ABT-737 EU Member States are planning to install 44.2 GW of offshore wind energy and 2.3 GW of tidal, wave and ocean energy C1GALT1 in 2020 (increased from 2.6 and 0.2 GW in 2010), which accounts for 12.2% of total renewable electricity capacity, or 5.2% of total renewable energy (including

transport and heating/cooling) in 2020 [31]. As the offshore renewable industry grows, the spatial requirements are likely to have significant effects on other uses of the sea, such as fishing and navigation [32]. There are also potential tensions between offshore renewable developments and Natura 2000 sites [29]. How such conflicts are addressed will have major implications for MSP, which will be discussed in the next section. The reform of the CFP will have a significant effect on the implementation of other EU policies, particularly the Birds and Habitats Directives and the MSFD. A key difference between the CFP and other policy drivers discussed in this paper is that the European Commission has exclusive competence through the CFP for managing fisheries beyond 12 nautical miles in Member States’ EEZs. This is based on the recognition that fisheries in a given Member State’s waters have long been accessed by fishermen from other Member States, therefore fisheries regulation would benefit from an EU-wide approach, achieved through a number of regulations and Council Decisions adopted under the CFP. The CFP was officially established in 1983, and is currently undergoing a reform process. The revised CFP is expected to enter into force during 2013.