In each condition, children received two trials, one resulting in a group of 5 puppets, and one resulting in a group of 6 puppets, both to be placed www.selleckchem.com/products/PF-2341066.html on a tree with 6 branches (so we could compare searching across sets of 5 and 6 puppets, just as in Experiment 1). For the puppet addition/subtraction condition, the outcome-6 trial started with a group of 5 puppets placed on a tree with 6 branches. Then, while the puppets were in the box, the experimenter took an extra puppet out her sleeve, and put it in the box, narrating, “Look at that, here is another puppet coming!”. The outcome-5 trial started with a group of 6 puppets, one per branch on the tree. After all the puppets were placed
in the box, the experimenter reached in the box and removed one puppet, showed it to the child, and put it in a bag Vorinostat manufacturer on the floor, narrating, “He does not want to sleep; he is going to the jungle”. For the branch addition/subtraction condition, new trees were crafted such that one branch could be either added or removed (beginning with 5 or 7 branches and ending with
6 branches). The outcome-5 trial started with a tree with 5 branches (no empty branch). Then, while the puppets were in the box, the experimenter added a new branch to the tree, narrating, “That night, there is a big storm with lots of wind, a new branch is coming!” The rest of the trial unfolded as before with the tree now having 6 branches. The outcome-6 trial started with 6 puppets placed on a tree with 7 branches (one empty branch). Again, while the puppets were in the box, the experimenter
described a storm in which one of the branches flew away, thus resulting in 6 puppets to be placed on a tree with 6 branches. Following the two addition/subtraction trials, children were again given two trials in the 11-branch condition, as in Experiment 1. All the data of the 11-branch condition will be pooled together and analyzed as Experiment 5. Fig. 3 presents the ifenprodil findings. In contrast to Experiment 1, children’s searching time did not differ between the outcome-5 and the outcome-6 trials, F (1, 22) < 1, ηp2=.04. This was true of each condition tested separately: F (1, 11) = 1.4, p = .27, ηp2=.11 for the puppet addition/subtraction condition, F(1,11)<1,ηp2<.01 for the branch addition/subtraction condition, and no interaction was observed between Condition and Outcome size: F (1, 22) < 1, ηp2=.02. Children were not able to construct the correct one-to-one correspondence relation after the addition and subtraction events, whether the events were applied to a set that was invisible at the moment of the transformation (the puppets) or to a set that remained visible throughout the trial (the branches). The findings of Experiment 2 provided no evidence that children appreciated how the operations of adding or subtracting should affect the one-to-one correspondence mapping between the puppets and the branches.