Journal of Physiotherapy will continue to advocate for the adoption of GRADE and better reporting of comparative research in its efforts to help advance evidence-based physiotherapy. “
“This 59th volume marks the first occasion of publication of clinical trial protocols in Journal of Physiotherapy. A trial protocol is a document that is developed before a research study commences. It provides the background and justification for the trial, describes the trial method,

and documents how the data will be analysed. Protocols of clinical trials have been published in a number of health science journals for several years. It is recognised that this process helps to improve the standard and communication of health-related research in the following ways ( Chalmers and Altman 1999, Eysenbach 2004): • Allowing readers to compare the planned trial with how the MDV3100 datasheet trial was actually conducted In addition, trial protocols are likely to be of value to clinical physiotherapists because they: • Help physiotherapists easily stay abreast of the cutting edge of physiotherapy research It is the intention of the Journal of Physiotherapy Editorial Board that the protocols published in this journal will provide these benefits to the research and clinical

communities. In alignment with the Journal’s standards of publication, published protocols will describe flagship trials that have been funded by nationally or internationally competitive funding schemes. Alectinib mouse The abstract of each protocol will be published in the printed issue, accompanied by a commentary from a distinguished expert in that field. The aim of the commentary is to help readers understand the Oxygenase potential impact that the trial will have on physiotherapy practice or the way we understand therapeutic modalities and/or diseases managed by physiotherapists. The commentary

will also highlight important strengths and limitations of the trial that will aid readers with their interpretation of the trial. The full trial protocol will be available online, for those who wish to read further detail about the study. While the publication of trial protocols is one important step that can reduce misconduct in the publication of research findings, it is by no means a panacea for such wrongdoing, which may be the result of ineptitude or scientific fraud (Hush and Herbert 2009). For example, a review of protocols published in The Lancet found instances where the primary and secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses were different from those in the protocol ( Al-Marzouki et al 2008). These insights from a leading medical journal with experience of publishing trial protocols have been useful in the development of clear criteria for authors considering publication of a trial protocol in Journal of Physiotherapy.