One interview was considered invalid, because it was conducted with the victim’s husband. Among the 86 victims who participated in the follow-up study, two had consulted for three different events of violence and three for two events. These five persons were interviewed about the most recent event. Measures The Epacadostat in vivo variables listed below were taken into account and were based on the

information contained in the medical files. Given the small size of the sample, values were grouped in a maximum of 3–4 categories, with the exception of the occupational classification variable. Socio-demographics: age (<35/35–44/45+), gender, nationality (Swiss/non-Swiss); foreigners with a work and residence permit (yes/no); and highest level of education (compulsory or no school/vocational

education and training/high school and beyond). Work situation: type of occupation (14 categories); occupational status (employee/self-employed); and occupational sector (agriculture/industry/services). Medical history: generally in good health (yes/no); and previous experience of violence (yes/no). Characteristics of the violent event: type of workplace violence (internal/external/both internal and external); internal violence perpetrator (subordinate/colleague/superior); and time of the assault (day work: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m./evening Defactinib mouse work 8–10 p.m./night work 11 p.m. to 6 a.m.). A measure to categorize occupations according to the degree of organizational and personal awareness as well as risk of workplace violence (low/moderate/high) was developed in the qualitative section of the study selleckchem as a result of a thematic content analyses of the respondents’ statements (De Puy et al. 2012). These

three degrees of awareness were also characterized by different grades of surprise and shock at being assaulted at work. The “high risk and awareness of violence jobs” category included occupations where the risk of violence was systematically considered as “part of the job” by respondents (police officers, prison guards, private security agents and public transportation ticket controllers). These job holders explained that they were prepared and trained to meet aggressive resistance when controlling, arresting or sanctioning subjects. They mentioned that their organizations had protocols for dealing with such events. In these “high risk and awareness of violence jobs,” assaults were never deemed normal but they were considered by respondents as a frequent and expected occupational risk. The “moderate risk and awareness of violence jobs” category included occupations in contact with the public on a daily basis (taxi drivers, bus drivers, salespersons, post office staff, healthcare staff, social workers, waiters, teachers, janitors and sex workers). Those who held “moderate risk and awareness of violence jobs” provided different types of services to customers, patients, etc.