The available results suggest that this is the case, but more precise experiments are needed. Recently, optogenetic methods have
been used to show that odor recognition can be disrupted by selectively interfering with information processes at particular phases of the sniff cycle (Smear et al., 2011). If the hypothesis we are proposing is correct, disrupting information at a particular theta phase should affect information represented at that phase, but not information represented at other phases. Theta is critical for the transmission of multi-item messages because it provides a phase reference that signifies the onset of the message. This phase reference must be shared by sender and receiver; the high observed theta coherence between communicating regions appears to satisfy this requirement. The role of gamma is to define an item in a multi-item Dabrafenib message. Selleck SRT1720 Gamma contributes to this in three ways: (1) it helps to form the message by allowing only the most excited cells to fire, (2) it synchronizes
spikes (clustered spiking can be effectively detected in downstream regions), and (3) it creates pauses between items that prevent errors in decoding the message. The communication of the multipart messages to downstream networks may be aided by coherence in the gamma band, but this is probably not required. We suspect that the small increases in gamma coherence that occur during communication are probably a result of effective communication rather than the cause. Because gamma cycles are not of the same duration, detection methods based on exact clocking are not plausible. Thus, although phase-dependent detectors ( Jensen, 2001) can be used to detect early versus late items, detection of the information in a specific gamma subcycle does not
appear possible. However, many useful functions do not require exact clocking. For instance, according to one model ( Fukai, 1999), the sequence of actions to be executed is sent from the hippocampus to PAK6 the striatum by a theta-gamma code; the striatum stores this sequence and then executes the actions in order, using other information to orchestrate the exact timing of each action. Another useful operation would be the recall of a sequence that contained a salient element such as reward. The detection of this element could be important to downstream networks even if the exact position of that element in the recalled sequence was uncertain. Finally, the entire recalled sequence may be processed (chunked) to represent a higher-level item. Network models that perform such chunking depend on the ordering of items rather than on exact timing (H. Sanders, B. Kolterman, D. Rinberg, A. Koulakov, and J. Lisman, 2012, Soc. Neurosci., abstract). As described above, when the hippocampus communicates with target regions, the theta in the two regions becomes high. Virtually nothing is known about how this coherence is produced.