The basic framework of ESI was modified in this study to make the assessment system more flexible, allowing the comparison of the relative sustainability status of targeted regions for not just one, but various time periods. Esty et al. (2005) reported the relative environmental sustainability performance of various countries for the year 2005. The ESI, as opposed to those with definitive types of indicators, such as the capital check details approach,

is an indicative method that aims to clarify the relative sustainability performance between countries. Since the assessment method demonstrates sustainability status in the form of aggregate scores, it has the potential advantage of providing a clear message regarding overall pictures about relative sustainability status across targeted countries and is, therefore, considered to be useful for policy evaluations. In Esty

et al. (2005), the scores of ESI were calculated from aggregate component scores, representing important fields for assessing environmental sustainability. The ESI consists of five components, environmental systems, reducing environmental stresses, reducing human vulnerability, social and learn more institutional capacity, and global stewardship. These five components are calculated from the aggregation of another 21 indicators and 76 variables, as shown in “Indicators based on the see more capital approach”. These indicators represent more specific factors, such as water stress and eco-efficiency, and variables are directly obtained from real data. The novel aspect of the case study with our method is Protein tyrosine phosphatase the calculation of the relative performance of the sustainability status of China’s provinces over two different time periods. More specifically, we developed the calculation framework

so that the performance in terms of relative sustainability is comparable across provinces for different time periods, i.e., the years 2000 and 2005, on the same basis. With the indicative assessment method, we intend to explore the relative status of sustainability among provinces and simultaneously investigate chronological trends of such integrated sustainability status, components, and individual variables in each province. Selection of components and variables To evaluate China’s sustainability at the provincial level, we first identified three components of sustainability. The selection of the criteria encompassed the current situation in China, i.e., the most important challenges that China is and will be facing. Rapid economic growth has not only caused huge disparities in socio-economic performance across regions, but also serious environmental issues. Further, with a population of 1.3 billion, efficient resource utilization has been, and will continue to be, one of the most critical issues in China.