Therefore, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of caspase-3 shRNA in a rat model of lung Defactinib clinical trial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Methods: Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury was induced in rats by clamping the hilum of the left lung for 1 hour. In vivo delivery of caspase-3 shRNA was performed by intratracheal administration 48 hours before ischemia. As controls, animals received either scrambled shRNA or RNase-free 5% dextrose in water solution. Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the gene silencing efficacy. The therapeutic effects of shRNA were evaluated by lung function analysis and the ratio
of wet/dry weight.
Results: In this study, we have shown that ischemia-reperfusion injury is associated with an increased level of lung caspase-3 messenger RNA. Animals treated with caspase-3 shRNA showed a significant downregulation in lung expression of caspase-3 at transcripts and protein levels. Lung function was protected by caspase-3 shRNA therapy, inasmuch as levels of partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide were significantly increased and reduced, respectively.
Conclusions: In summary, we have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of shRNA to knock down the expression of caspase-3 and prevent
VX-809 price lung apoptotic injury. Our findings may have some potential therapeutic relevance for treating lung ischemia-reperfusion injury
after transplantation.(J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 758-64)”
“Objective: The study objectives were to (1) compare survival after lung transplantation in patients requiring pretransplant mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with that of patients not requiring mechanical support and (2) identify risk factors for mortality.
Methods: Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing for lung transplantation from October 1987 to January 2008. A total of 15,934 primary transplants were performed: 586 in patients on mechanical ventilation and 51 in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Differences between nonsupport patients and those on mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support were expressed as 2 propensity scores see more for use in comparing risk-adjusted survival.
Results: Unadjusted survival at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months was 83%, 67%, 62%, and 57% for mechanical ventilation, respectively; 72%, 53%, 50%, and 45% for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, respectively; and 93%, 85%, 79%, and 70% for unsupported patients, respectively (P < .0001). Recipients on mechanical ventilation were younger, had lower forced vital capacity, and had diagnoses other than emphysema. Recipients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were also younger, had higher body mass index, and had diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis/bronchiectasis.