Time to peak impact, expressed as the percentage increase of time to peak impact when compared with the no-pad condition, was calculated.\n\nResults: All pads were found to reduce peak impact force and increase time to peak impact. Results varied between 1% and 70%, depending on the drop height and properties of the impactor. The best performing pad was the thickest, and all pads were best able to attenuate click here force under hard-object impacts particularly for the lower loads.\n\nConclusion: Although several limitations exist to laboratory-based studies such as these, the inconsistencies in force attenuation were

nonetheless disappointing. The pads appear to “bottom out” under higher-impact loads and therefore offer little protection when the athlete may need it most.”
“Objective: Chemoradiation is the standard therapy for advanced stages of cervical cancer. In developing countries, where 80% of cervical cancers occur, this is not always available. Carbogen breathing and oral nicotinamide (CON) therapy, aimed at overcoming tumor hypoxia, has shown to improve treatment efficacy in some epithelial tumors. ACY-738 cell line This study investigates the effect of CON during

(chemo) radiation of advanced stages of cervical cancer on overall survival, local and regional control, and toxicity. Methods: From December 2006 to February 2010, 139 patients with stage IB2 to IVA cervical cancer were nonrandomly selleck chemicals assigned to receive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) with or without CON. Differences in overall survival, local and regional control after 1 year, and toxicity were assessed in 113 evaluable patients. Thirty-two patients received RT, 16

received CRT, 45 received CON-RT, and 20 received CON-CRT. Results: The CON-RT and RT groups contained significantly more patients with a poor performance status and IIIB and IVA tumors. Despite these differences in baseline characteristics, overall survival and local and regional control at 1 year were not significantly different (P = 0.10 and P = 0.19, respectively). Toxicity scores also did not differ (P = 0.60 and P = 0.73 for acute and late toxicity). Conclusions: Addition of CON to standard (chemo) radiation gives comparable survival and control rates. The effect of CON might be underestimated due to differences in baseline characteristics. Because chemotherapy cannot always be (completely) administered in low-resource settings, CON could be a worthy substitute. The CON treatment is feasible and safe.”
“PURPOSE: To evaluate acupuncture as treatment for glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective double-masked randomized crossover study. METHODS: SETTING: Clinical practice. POPULATION: One eye per patient with primary open-angle glaucoma and stable intraocular pressure (IOP).