By contrast, we predicted that there would be no such correlation, even when controlling for antisocial tendencies. 2. Egoism and concern for humanity as a whole. Philosophers distinguish three senses of egoism. According to psychological egoism, people are only actually motivated by
their self-interest. According to rational egoism, promotion of one’s self-interest is the only rational course of action. According to ethical egoism, promotion of one’s own self-interest is the only moral course of action. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with each of these three views. To the extent that what is typically described as ‘utilitarian’ judgment expresses genuine selleckchem concern for the greater good, it should be strongly negatively correlated with ethical
egoism, as well as, arguably, with rational egoism. And although psychological egoism is a descriptive claim rather than a normative view, one would expect individuals with radically altruist moral beliefs to also deny the cynical view that people always act only out of selfish motives. However, given the consistent association between ‘utilitarian’ judgment and psychopathy, we predicted the contrary results. In addition, we included the Identification with All Humanity Scale (IWAH), a scale that measures the extent to which individuals identify with humanity as a whole as opposed to exhibit more parochial attachment to one’s own community or country ( McFarland, Webb, & Brown, 2012). Such all-encompassing, impartial PCI-32765 price concern is a core feature of classical utilitarianism ( Hare, 1981). To the extent that utilitarian judgment in personal dilemmas expresses such concern for the greater good of all, one would expect a strong positive correlation between such judgment and IWAH. However, since greater IWAH is likely to be driven by greater empathic concern, we instead predicted a negative correlation between the two. 3. ‘Utilitarian’
judgment and sensitivity to self-interest. To investigate whether the seemingly ‘utilitarian’ judgments of individuals higher on psychopathy are actually especially sensitive to considerations Megestrol Acetate of self-interest, we included, following Moore et al. (2008), not only personal dilemmas in which one is asked whether to sacrifice a single individual to save a group of strangers (other-benefit dilemmas), but also dilemmas in which, in the hypothetical scenario, this sacrifice would also benefit the participant (self-benefit dilemmas). To the extent that what is typically described as ‘utilitarian’ judgment really does reflect a broadly impartial, all-concerning outlook, this distinction should not make a difference to rates of such judgment. Moore et al.