This was to ensure that the number of trials that were not contaminated by electrical stimulation were equivalent to the rest condition and visual attention condition. We aimed to discover whether effects in the attention-to-hand condition had a somatotopic organization. In separate blocks (randomized order between participants), MEPs were recorded from the FDI and ADM muscles while electrical stimuli were applied over either the FDI or ADM
muscle. For TMS we targeted an area where ideally MEPs in both the FDI and ADM muscles could be evoked. If it was not possible to record MEPs of equal size in both muscles, the FDI muscle was prioritized. This control experiment (n = 4) tested whether the effect on MEP Selleckchem Epigenetic inhibitor amplitude and intracortical excitability during the visual attention task was purely caused by visual input rather than visual attentional processes. Participants were simply asked to sit in front of the monitor and look at it while it displayed the feature discrimination task. No instruction beyond this was given. This control experiment (n = 5) explored whether the verbal response
and speech production by the subject after the detection of cutaneous and visual stimuli had an impact on the output measures. Doramapimod Here the participants were not allowed to spontaneously report their answer to the investigator but had to report it after a ‘Go’ Rucaparib chemical structure cue at ~2000 ms after the end of each trial. Here (n = 3) we tested whether the observed changes in MEP amplitude were accompanied by changes in spinal cord excitability. H-reflexes were elicited in the ADM and FDI muscles by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the elbow (single square-wave shock, 1 ms duration, frequency of stimulation 0.25 Hz). The intensity of stimulation was set to obtain
H-reflexes of about 10% of the maximal motor response amplitude. Throughout the experiment, the amplitude of the M-wave was visually controlled for potential fluctuations in stimulus strength. For each experimental condition, i.e. the resting condition and the somatotopic version of the attend-to-hand task and the visual attention task, 20 trials for each condition were recorded and stored for off-line analysis. The peak-to-peak amplitude of each H-reflex was analysed off-line. The size of the conditioned responses (H-reflexes evoked in the attention tasks) was then expressed as a percentage of the size of control responses (H-reflexes evoked in the resting subject). Single MEPs were measured from peak to peak and averaged. For SICI and ICF, the amplitude of the conditioned response was normalized to the amplitude of the unconditioned test MEP for each ISI.